The Veracity Engine

Every assertion traced to its source. Automatically.

Other platforms check that a citation looks real. We retrieve the actual opinion. Quotes are compared word-for-word. Holdings are validated against the propositions they claim to support. Treatment history confirms the authority hasn't been overruled. Every dimension — for firms who cannot afford hallucinated output.

Citation
VERIFIED

GuideOne Elite Ins. Co. v. Fielder Rd. Baptist Church, 197 S.W.3d 305 (Tex. 2006)

Confirmed · 197-sw3d-305

Quoted Text
MODIFIED

“the factual allegations in the complaint potentially fall within the policy’s coverage”

Quoted in Brief
“the factual allegations in the complaint potentially fall within the policy’s coverage”
Actual Case Text
“the factual allegations in the petition potentially fall within the policy’s coverage”
Fuzzy Match
Legal Proposition
SUPPORTEDACCURATE

Insurer’s duty to defend triggered when factual allegations potentially fall within coverage

Eight-corners rule confirmed

Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986)

OVERRULED
1
APPLIED OVERRULING
56
QUESTIONED
10
DISTINGUISHED
7
FOLLOWED
55
DISCUSSED
19
REFERENCED
72
OVERRULED
Lawrence v. Texas, 156 L. Ed. 2d 508 (2003)
Bowers was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today. It ought not to remain binding precedent. Bowers v. Hardwick should be and now is overruled.
APPLIED OVERRULING
Eknes-Tucker v. Governor of Alabama, 114 F.4th 1241 (2024)
In so doing the Court overruled Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986), and said that Bowers had 'misapprehended' the pertinent liberty interest...
QUESTIONED
Lawrence v. State, 41 S.W.3d 349 (2001)
Thus, the Court, sub silentio, rejected the 'implementation of traditional notions of morality' justification deemed sufficient in Bowers v. Hardwick...
DISTINGUISHED
Meinhold v. U.S. Dep't of Defense, 123 F.3d 1275 (1997)
Bowers never addressed the issue of whether a person's status as a homosexual, as opposed to conduct, was constitutionally protected.
FOLLOWED
City of Bremerton v. Widell, 51 P.3d 733 (2002)
Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has never extended constitutional protection to nonfamilial relationships.
DISCUSSED
State v. Goewey, 2015 VT 142 (2015)
The longstanding criminal prohibition of homosexual sodomy upon which the Bowers decision placed such reliance...

Agentic Associate

Give it the directive. It explores, analyzes, executes, and reports back.

The Agentic Associate is an autonomous agent that researches, analyzes, and executes at project scale. Hand it a 2,000-page discovery production and it produces a structured intelligence report. Tell it to draft responses to 30 interrogatories and it works through each one autonomously. Direct it to pull filings from PACER, cross-reference them against your complaint, and flag inconsistencies. It handles the entire workflow end to end. It does what a junior associate would do, except it reads every page, misses nothing, and works in parallel.

Agentic AssociatePlanning
0.00

Proactive Authority Detection

Verification that runs without being asked.

Proactive Authority Detection (PAD) solves the verification problem by automatically verifying every authority mentioned in every AI response — in the background, without the user asking, without any delay to the conversation. PAD also surfaces authorities that bear on the issue but were not cited, closing gaps that a reactive tool would never flag. If you ever missed an issue on a law school exam, you know the value.

Verified Research Pipeline

Every result proven real before you see it.

Large language models fabricate citations 20-40% of the time — complete inventions with plausible reporters and page numbers. The Research Pipeline takes your given topic and presents you with an exhaustive curation of real, verbatim quotes from authority surfaced on that issue, ready to insert in your papers. That authority is verified to exist, validated against the claim it supports, and checked for treatment.

Legal Research

Fourth Amendment digital privacy — warrantless surveillance — cell-site location information

Juxtaposition Analysis

Tactical deconstruction of the adversarial record.

Juxtaposition compares any two documents paragraph-by-paragraph, flagging every misstatement, every unsupported claim, and every argument your existing record already defeats. Use it to compare your complaint against the opponent’s motion to dismiss, a draft against the executed version, or an opponent’s statement of undisputed facts against the record. The output is a list of exposed misrepresentations, backed by multiple verbatim quotes from the underlying documents, properly cited, and ready to drop into a memo.

Defendant's MTD

Plaintiff's fraud claim fails because the Complaint contains no allegation that Defendant made any representation regarding the property's environmental condition prior to closing. See Compl. ¶¶ 1-68.

Your Complaint

¶ 34. On March 3, 2024, at Harris & Webb LLP, Defendant's VP of Acquisitions James Rourke stated: “Phase II cleared the site. There are no environmental concerns.”

¶ 35. Defendant produced this in writing via email on March 5, 2024, attaching “Environmental Status — All Clear.”

¶ 36. Plaintiff executed the Purchase Agreement on March 12, 2024, committing $4.7M in reliance.

Sovereign Library

Gets smarter with every user. Instant. Free.

Every authority, verified by any user, becomes instantly available to every user. Full opinion text, treatment history, citing-case quotes. What one user verifies, every user benefits from. The platform gets smarter with every query.

80,412authorities
MirandaDickersonBerghuisSeibert

Plan Mode

Define the workflow. Approve once. Come back to a finished product.

Complex legal work cannot be achieved by a single prompt. It requires multiple interdependent steps. Plan Mode lets you build an autonomous workflow with optional Human In The Loop (HITL) and verification checkpoints as you desire. No more being chained to your computer — approve the plan, step away, and come back to finished work.

Executing Plan
Progress: 0/5 chunks complete · 0%
Chunk 1:
Ingest Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (42 pages)
Queued
Chunk 2:
Juxtaposition — MTD vs. Complaint
Queued
Chunk 3:
Outline Opposition Brief
Queued
Chunk 4:
Draft Opposition with Verified Citations
Queued
Chunk 5:
Verify Draft — Full Veracity Check
Queued
Document Analysis
Employment Agreement (47 pages)
KEY TERMS
Effective Date:March 1, 2024
Term:3 years with auto-renewal
Base Compensation:$285,000
NON-COMPETE
Scope:50-mile radius
Duration:24 months post-termination
DEVIATION DETECTEDExceeds industry standard (12 months)
TERMINATION PROVISIONS
For Cause:Section 8(a) — 6 triggers identified
Without Cause:90-day notice + 12mo severance
Change of Control:Double-trigger acceleration
IP ASSIGNMENT
Scope:"all work product"
RISK FLAGOverbroad — includes pre-employment inventions
4 of 23 extractions complete...
Document Processing

Document Intelligence Pipeline

We solved the context window problem.

Every AI has a context window. Send it a 200-page contract and attention fades — middle pages lost, page 150 analyzed shallower than page 5. We solved the context window problem. Every section of every document receives full-depth analysis, regardless of length. Page 150 of a 200-page contract gets the same attention as page 5. Complete with Tabular Review, Deviation Detection, and detailed strategic analysis.

Sovereign Shield

Defending the Privilege.

Standard cloud AI (e.g., Claude, ChatGPT) breaks the expectation of confidentiality that privilege requires. The terms and conditions of even the leading legal AIs are suspect (given their reliance on old GPT models, multi-tenant hosting, array of subprocessors, and non-HIPAA compliance). In U.S. v. Heppner (S.D.N.Y. 2026), Judge Rakoff ruled AI exchanges were not privileged because the provider retains access rights. Sovereign Shield uses Trusted Execution Environments with cryptographic attestation: the provider is mathematically incapable of accessing your data. Kovel-grade, hardware-isolated, zero retention, and designed to meet the standard laid out in Heppner.

Research to Brief

Curation

Research conversation to structured brief ammunition. One click.

Essential facts and citations scatter across dozens of messages in any AI research conversation. Curation extracts them into a structured report — full provenance on every finding — ready to seed a fresh conversation, hand off to a colleague, or drop into a brief. No more combing through someone else’s AI chat.

You
What are the minimum contacts requirements in this jurisdiction?
AI
Under International Shoe, the defendant must have certain minimum contacts...
You
What about the forum selection clause?
AI
Under M/S Bremen v. Zapata, forum selection clauses are prima facie valid...
Curate
PERSONAL JURISDICTION
QUOTE · Message 7 · AI
minimum contacts with the forum state such that...
FINDING · Message 23 · User
Defendant's server located in forum state
FORUM SELECTION
QUOTE · Message 31 · AI
prima facie valid and should be enforced unless unreasonable...
Does the complaint adequately plead reliance?

Knowledge Base

Your firm. Your matters. Your AI.

The research memo you wrote for Client A six months ago contains analysis relevant to Client B today. The Knowledge Base makes your firm's accumulated work searchable: contracts, briefs, templates, memos. Scoped by project and jurisdiction. Private to your firm, never shared, and never trained on.

Bluebook Compliance

Citations Tab

Bluebook compliance at a glance. Every citation checked before you file.

Every citation in your document audited against the Bluebook. A health score shows what’s valid, what needs attention, and what has a one-click fix. Hover any citation in the editor for status, corrections, and the specific rule violated.

Citation Health38/42 valid

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)

Valid

Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007)

Valid

Conley, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46

Short cite missing “at” before pincite — R. 3.2
Italicize: “Conley” — B1 (case names in short cites)
Quick Fix

International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)

Valid

Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014)

Use 571 U.S. 117 — official U.S. Reports cite available

Quick Fix

Suggested correction:

Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117 (2014)

R. 10.3.1 — Use official U.S. Reports citation when available

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court, 137 S. Ct. 1773 (2017)

Valid

Billable Hours

01:23:45Current Timer
Add Time to Project
Select project ▾
127.5 / 160.0 hrs this month
Today's Activity
6.75 hrsTotal Time
3Entries
AI SuggestionsAS5
BILSmith v. Jones1h30m92%
Reviewing defendant's motion to dismiss and researching Rule 12(b)(6) standards
BILSmith v. Jones2h15m88%
Drafting opposition brief, Section III, personal jurisdiction arguments
GAPSmith v. Jones1h30m
No time logged 2:00 PM – 3:30 PM. Active in Smith v. Jones during this period.
2:00 PM \u2013 3:30 PM \u00B7 1h30m
ENHSmith v. Jones
Research
Researching personal jurisdiction standards under International Shoe and Daimler for MTD opposition
BILSmith v. Jones1h30m85%
Analyzing deposition transcript of James Rourke, cross-referencing with complaint allegations ¶¶34-36
Today's Log
Reviewing MTD research1.5h
Smith v. Jones
Drafting opposition Section II2.25h
Smith v. Jones
Time Management

Time, Billing & Calendar

Stop reconstructing your day. Start reviewing it.

Lawyers lose 20-40% of billable time reconstructing their day at 6pm from memory. Veracity-Engine captures activity as you work, generates billing narratives, flags unbilled gaps, and ties your calendar to your timesheet. Review and accept, instead of reconstruct and guess. The future of timekeeping does not require you to make any effort to keep your time.

The Complete Platform

Every capability your practice needs. One subscription.

Agentic Associate

Autonomous multi-agent execution

Shepardizing

Good law, bad law, citing cases

RAG

Your case, not generic law

Redline Review

Two-phase proofread + veracity

Deviation Detection

Flags non-standard contract terms

Intelligence Dividend

Verified authorities cost $0 forever

Document Editing

Real-time collaborative

Version Control

Word-level diff, auto-save

Citations Tab

Bluebook compliance, health score

Time & Billing

AI narratives, gap detection

Calendar & Deadlines

Nothing missed. AI augmented.

Knowledge Base

Firm-private, AI-searchable

RBAC & Sharing

Granular permissions

Matter Management

Entity graph, party index

Curation System

Conversation to brief

Dashboard Intelligence

Widgets, workflow tracking

Immediate Action Pad

Zero-friction AI chat

Export

Documents, conversations, PDF

Veracity-Engine lion logo

Defensible Infrastructure for High-Stakes Litigation

Every plan includes all 38 capabilities. Choose your security posture and work capacity.